Sign of the Cross Abstract

     In this paper I will argue that The Sign of the Cross was one of the best movies in the genre of ancient epic films because of its grand scenes and editing techniques, the use of plot to make a simple but beautiful point, and the complexity and development of the main characters, which creates a film that will engage viewers from any generation.
     The grand scenes and editing techniques used is one thing that makes The Sign of the Cross interesting to watch. This movie was in black and white, but it used shots and editing techniques that engaged the viewer. For example, some editing techniques supported the themes of the film and were very obvious, like the cut from Poppea to the leopards. Some were subtle but brilliantly conceived, like the shot of Marcus's guests through a Roman's hair. The editing techniques also made for dynamic and engaging storytelling, for example Poppea's bath which starts with the shot of a single bucket being filled with donkey's milk. The grand scenes also used editing to engage the viewer. For example, the hundreds of starving lions coming up the staircase and into the arena.
     The Sign of the Cross also uses its plot to make a point. The point of the plot was to show Christian ideals. This might be off-putting to some, but it was done effectively because while Marcus and Mercia represent opposing ideals, their own romance and plot development is interesting to the viewer. For example, the last scene is very simple (especially in contrast to the previous gladiatorial scenes) but made the point beautifully as Mercia and Marcus make their way into the light.
    Finally, the complexity of the main characters and their stories of development also engage the viewer. The viewer wants Marcus to succeed (to convert, or to become a better person), but also roots against him as he shows himself to be selfish and only want Mercia. His conversion to Christianity is sudden but can be seen as yet another example of a seemingly good act only stemming from his desire for Mercia and not for Christianity. The relationship between Mercia and Marcus is unhealthy but interesting to watch the dynamic of. In comparison, Mercia is less of a dynamic character and is not morally complicated, but she offsets Marcus's personality. She is also interesting for the viewer to watch and even identify with because she represents the 'good guy' and is always seen as being a strong woman who stands up for her views and does not give in to Marcus.
     The Sign of the Cross is not without faults. For example, Marcus's sudden conversion to Christianity. This can be seen as problematic because it seemingly goes against his character motivations. However, this is actually an interesting choice and keeps the viewer engaged until the very last second of the film, as well as using this plot line to atone Marcus as a character.
      In conclusion, the use of editing techniques, plot, and characters engage the viewers watching this film no matter what year the are seeing it. It is a story of Christian ideals but one can also focus on the story between the two love interests or see it for a story where a woman stands up for her ideals even in the face of death, with such conviction that a man (with a very self-serving personality) will even follow her.